H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 00:06 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 1-1
Nao Hibino and Kristyna Pliskova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2017 Nanchang fourth round 0-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 0-3 (ret.) | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2016* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,519 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |