H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nao Hibino vs Lauren Davis H2H: 0-1

Lauren Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2016 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nao Hibino
Japan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lauren Davis #85 6-4 6-1 Nao Hibino #141 Match data Oct 16, 2022 Q2 Q Guadalajara Open WTA 1000 Hard
Lauren Davis #99 6-2 6-4 Nao Hibino #60 Match data Mar 11, 2016* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nao Hibino #228 #56 1,050 1,726 80 121 39.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nao Hibino Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2015 6–2 75.0% #66 1,559 0 1 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2016 19–22 46.3% #94 1,639 0 1 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2017 11–17 39.3% #97 1,544 0 1 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2018 5–10 33.3% #114 1,597 0 1 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2019 6–5 54.5% #106 1,619 0 2 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2020 9–6 60.0% #73 1,647 0 2 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2021 5–17 22.7% #129 1,527 0 2 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2022 4–6 40.0% #138 1,578 0 2 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2023 9–12 42.9% #94 1,657 0 3 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2024 4–16 20.0% #145 1,603 0 3 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 2025 2–7 22.2% #174 1,514 0 3 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,558 0 3 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nao Hibino Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2015 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2017 11 11 22 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2019 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2021 1 9 10 10.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2023 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2024 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 65 83 148 43.9% 13 27 40 32.5% 2 11 13 15.4% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/195 of Nao Hibino's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nao Hibino Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2016 39/41 1.4 2.8 65.7% 58.2% 49.2% 50.1% 54.8% 54.9% 41.0% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2017 26/28 1.8 3.6 64.7% 58.6% 45.9% 54.7% 42.0% 53.9% 38.7% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2018 13/15 2.2 2.8 61.4% 60.0% 45.3% 59.2% 40.6% 54.4% 41.1% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2019 11/11 2.6 2.8 64.0% 64.7% 45.9% 56.5% 43.7% 57.7% 43.6% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2020 15/15 1.1 2.7 65.5% 62.6% 45.8% 52.9% 41.8% 56.6% 46.8% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2021 21/23 1.8 2.9 65.0% 55.1% 36.6% 39.9% 47.2% 48.2% 39.1% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2022 10/10 1.6 2.4 70.4% 59.9% 44.7% 43.5% 51.8% 55.2% 46.5% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2023 21/21 1.4 2.2 67.4% 58.0% 47.2% 47.1% 60.3% 54.4% 42.1% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2024 20/20 1.3 3.1 65.6% 55.3% 43.7% 48.7% 50.3% 51.1% 38.4% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 2025 3/9 2.0 3.0 64.6% 58.9% 48.8% 52.8% 45.8% 54.6% 43.7% 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 2026 1/2 2.0 3.0 63.2% 68.8% 32.1% 71.4% 25.0% 55.3% 41.6% 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
Career — 180/203 1.6 2.9 65.5% 58.6% 45.3% 50.1% 48.9% 53.8% 41.3% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nao Hibino Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2015 1560 105.6 — — — — +14 — — 66.7% +0.60 1–0 — — +0.71 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2016 1639 113.6 -1.11 -1.79 0.909 48.3% -18 -53 -78 44.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +0.05 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2017 1544 109.2 -2.04 -3.51 0.840 47.2% +35 -50 — 39.0% -0.76 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +0.77 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2018 1597 121.9 -0.94 -1.44 0.902 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.87 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.36 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2019 1619 112.2 -0.45 -0.48 1.031 50.5% +13 — — 45.8% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2020 1648 124.3 +0.36 +2.53 1.079 51.6% -35 -88 — 57.6% +0.73 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.20 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2021 1528 96.1 -6.17 -3.62 0.754 44.2% -45 -13 -10 22.7% -2.09 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2022 1578 112.0 -0.72 +0.28 1.038 50.9% -34 — — 47.6% +0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.93 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2023 1658 122.0 -1.96 -1.76 0.923 48.2% -9 — — 43.5% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 +0.98 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2024 1603 118.1 -4.14 -2.60 0.784 44.9% +36 -97 -114 28.6% -1.57 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 2025 1514 109.3 -1.77 -0.47 0.962 49.4% -11 +10 — 30.0% -1.65 0–2 — — -0.04 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 2026 1558 107.8 -0.02 +0.29 0.929 48.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
Career — 1726 117.5 -2.08 -1.72 0.893 47.8% 0 -46 -68 40.3% -0.70 25–27 (48%) 18–19 (49%) 101.7 +2.42 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.