H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Lauren Davis H2H: 0-1
Lauren Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2016 Indian Wells first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2022 | Guadalajara 500 | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 6-4 6-1 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 6-2 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |