H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Naomi Broady vs Alexa Glatch H2H: 1-0
Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Alexa Glatch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2015 Quebec City fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Naomi Broady | 6-4 6-2 | Alexa Glatch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexa Glatch | #977 | #102 | 615 | 1,531 | 16 | 46 | 25.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Broady | Alexa Glatch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #140 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #297 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #155 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |