H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Naomi Broady vs Carol Zhao H2H: 1-0
Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Carol Zhao in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2018 Monterrey third round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 31
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2018* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Broady | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | Carol Zhao | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carol Zhao | #432 | #131 | 458 | 1,515 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Broady | Carol Zhao | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #293 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #176 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #219 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |