H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Broady vs Carol Zhao H2H: 1-0

Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Carol Zhao in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2018 Monterrey Open first round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Broady
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Carol Zhao
Canada Age 31 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Broady #136 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 Carol Zhao #138 Match data Apr 5, 2018* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Broady #1,209 #76 875 1,604 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carol Zhao #432 #131 458 1,515 5 21 19.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Broady Carol Zhao
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #461 1,493 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #298 1,484 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #293 1,513 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #287 1,469 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #343 1,488 0 0
21 2011 1–2 33.3% #196 1,472 0 0 2016 0–2 0.0% #498 1,462 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #287 1,463 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #149 1,452 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2018 0–3 0.0% #299 1,446 0 0
24 2014 1–3 25.0% #170 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 5–5 50.0% #121 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 10–15 40.0% #91 1,495 0 0 2021 0–1 0.0% #290 1,416 0 0
27 2017 6–11 35.3% #117 1,551 0 0 2022 1–3 25.0% #176 1,399 0 0
28 2018 1–3 25.0% #250 1,485 0 0 2023 2–4 33.3% #219 1,441 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2024 1–2 33.3% #246 1,419 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #432 1,351 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Broady Carol Zhao
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 22 42 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 18 22 18.2% — 3 16 19 15.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 59/66 of Naomi Broady's and 26/26 of Carol Zhao's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Broady Carol Zhao
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 1.0 2.0 45.2% 47.4% 26.1% 25.0% 100.0% 35.7% 38.0%
19 2009 1/1 15.0 3.0 57.6% 70.6% 42.0% 61.5% 33.3% 58.5% 40.0% 2014 2/2 2.5 2.0 57.4% 68.3% 37.9% 58.3% 66.7% 55.5% 40.2%
20 2010 1/1 8.0 2.0 56.5% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 56.5% 35.7% 2015 2/2 2.0 3.5 46.7% 44.0% 47.7% 58.3% 10.0% 46.5% 34.9%
21 2011 3/3 12.7 4.3 54.0% 75.3% 48.4% 69.0% 15.8% 63.3% 34.5% 2016 2/2 2.5 4.0 57.0% 59.8% 34.4% 46.9% 41.7% 49.2% 39.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 2.0 7.0 56.3% 71.4% 50.0% 0.0% 75.0% 62.1% 34.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 3/3 0.3 6.0 58.3% 59.2% 38.9% 49.9% 23.7% 50.7% 34.9%
24 2014 4/4 9.3 4.3 56.9% 70.8% 43.8% 46.7% 42.1% 59.1% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 6/10 10.3 3.3 63.4% 78.6% 45.8% 46.4% 27.9% 66.7% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 23/26 8.4 4.8 57.9% 70.2% 39.9% 50.5% 38.0% 57.4% 36.1% 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 61.7% 58.6% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0% 48.9% 34.0%
27 2017 17/17 9.6 4.1 57.9% 74.7% 44.9% 49.7% 46.1% 62.0% 33.3% 2022 4/4 2.3 4.0 63.5% 62.6% 45.1% 57.8% 29.2% 55.9% 40.6%
28 2018 4/4 12.5 3.5 58.4% 64.4% 50.3% 64.0% 10.0% 58.8% 30.1% 2023 6/6 2.0 10.2 68.2% 59.8% 30.0% 44.9% 49.8% 50.2% 41.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 3/3 3.0 12.3 62.9% 71.8% 27.1% 55.0% 45.7% 54.6% 43.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 0.0 10.0 59.8% 61.5% 42.9% 58.3% 42.9% 54.0% 35.8%
Career — 59/67 9.6 4.2 58.2% 72.3% 43.3% 51.6% 36.3% 60.2% 34.0% — 26/26 1.8 6.8 60.5% 61.0% 36.6% 48.4% 45.3% 51.7% 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Broady Carol Zhao
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1494 101.4 -1.52 +2.05 0.591 37.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04
19 2009 1485 100.3 -1.38 -3.59 0.963 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 2014 1513 104.2 +0.20 0.00 0.903 48.0% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.02
20 2010 1470 99.4 -5.23 -2.65 0.821 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 2015 1489 92.9 -2.27 -1.66 0.653 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.75 — — — +0.27
21 2011 1473 95.0 +1.81 -0.83 0.939 48.5% — — +46 37.5% -0.62 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 2016 1462 102.6 -0.28 -1.04 0.779 44.2% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.02
22 2012 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 2017 1452 99.2 -0.88 +2.61 0.898 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1446 88.1 -1.92 -3.65 0.707 42.6% — — — 25.0% -2.75 0–2 1–0 — +0.10
24 2014 1460 101.3 -0.21 -3.52 0.709 45.2% — — +50 30.0% -1.10 1–1 1–0 — +0.03 2019 1448 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1511 105.2 +3.12 -3.00 0.975 48.6% +44 — -16 47.8% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1495 109.2 +0.76 -4.87 0.847 47.1% +47 — -85 41.0% -0.85 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.37 2021 1416 93.8 +3.05 -3.36 0.665 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
27 2017 1551 114.6 +2.49 -5.32 0.876 47.9% +6 — -166 42.9% -0.71 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -0.22 2022 1400 100.5 -0.44 -2.01 0.921 48.1% -28 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.31
28 2018 1485 104.1 +0.54 -1.89 0.732 44.6% +4 — — 30.0% -1.40 1–1 1–1 — -0.19 2023 1441 101.4 -2.20 -1.23 0.826 45.7% — — +178 35.7% -1.43 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.38
29 2019 1445 88.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1420 100.0 -1.37 +0.79 0.951 48.9% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1397 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1434 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1352 93.3 -2.87 -1.19 0.779 45.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1604 108.0 +1.33 -4.25 0.854 47.3% +30 — -43 39.8% -0.76 13–16 (45%) 11–13 (46%) 99.4 -0.26 — 1515 95.5 -1.22 -1.13 0.808 45.3% -6 — +178 27.1% -1.90 1–8 (11%) 4–3 (57%) 94.0 +4.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.