H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 1-0
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2019 Indian Wells second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-2 6-0 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |