H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 1-0
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2017 Moscow fourth round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2017 | Moscow | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Elena Vesnina | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Elena Vesnina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |