H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 1-1
Natalia Vikhlyantseva and Kristyna Pliskova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2019 Prague third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-3 6-4 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| May 7, 2018 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-4 6-4 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |