H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2017 Linz Open first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-0 6-2 | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data | Oct 12, 2017* | R32 | Linz Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,686 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,690 | 26 | 44 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–19 | 20.8% | #134 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2018 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 16 | 29 | 45 | 35.6% | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/90 of Natalia Vikhlyantseva's and 65/68 of Veronica Cepede Royg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2015 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 57.6% | 66.8% | 39.7% | 54.5% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.8% | 68.8% | 42.5% | 39.3% | 46.8% | 58.6% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 30/31 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 61.4% | 66.1% | 45.6% | 56.5% | 47.6% | 57.8% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 22/24 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 62.1% | 62.5% | 43.8% | 52.1% | 41.2% | 55.1% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 19/19 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 61.9% | 65.1% | 46.0% | 61.8% | 52.2% | 57.8% | 44.0% | 2014 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 65.0% | 58.8% | 35.4% | 31.8% | 59.4% | 50.8% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2020 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 59.2% | 61.9% | 48.3% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 56.3% | 39.7% | 2015 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 59.6% | 62.6% | 54.3% | 54.0% | 64.7% | 58.8% | 47.5% |
| 24 | 2021 | 8/8 | 1.6 | 8.0 | 59.1% | 62.9% | 37.0% | 54.6% | 49.3% | 52.8% | 46.4% | 2016 | 14/15 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 48.3% | 42.8% | 51.5% | 56.3% | 44.4% |
| 25 | 2022 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 59.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 43.2% | 35.0% | 2017 | 25/26 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 63.7% | 59.5% | 44.3% | 48.8% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 43.6% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17/17 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 61.9% | 60.3% | 47.2% | 48.3% | 50.3% | 55.2% | 40.7% |
| Career | — | 87/90 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 61.3% | 64.5% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 46.6% | 56.4% | 42.2% | — | 65/70 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 60.0% | 46.5% | 47.1% | 51.3% | 55.0% | 43.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1500 | 106.1 | -1.22 | +0.71 | 0.886 | 47.9% | +20 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1585 | 110.1 | +1.88 | -1.70 | 0.986 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1648 | 124.3 | +1.14 | -1.22 | 0.998 | 50.0% | +5 | -174 | +30 | 48.5% | +0.01 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.61 | 2012 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1568 | 117.8 | -1.37 | -1.37 | 0.894 | 47.8% | +20 | -72 | +61 | 28.3% | -1.19 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.0 | -1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1626 | 125.8 | -0.20 | +0.37 | 1.042 | 51.2% | -7 | -45 | +34 | 50.0% | +0.33 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.34 | 2014 | 1468 | 95.3 | -1.36 | -1.34 | 0.778 | 44.5% | — | +65 | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1575 | 106.6 | -0.44 | +0.12 | 0.910 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.30 | 2015 | 1487 | 110.2 | +0.96 | +1.62 | 1.153 | 53.1% | — | +51 | — | 57.1% | +0.79 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1543 | 101.7 | -1.92 | +0.59 | 0.983 | 49.5% | — | +35 | — | 42.1% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.47 | 2016 | 1521 | 115.2 | -0.05 | -0.12 | 1.016 | 50.2% | -24 | -22 | +151 | 41.7% | -0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.5 | +0.56 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1477 | 94.3 | -2.22 | -0.26 | 0.617 | 39.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.20 | 2017 | 1623 | 112.8 | -1.80 | +0.06 | 0.944 | 48.7% | -64 | 0 | +49 | 42.9% | -0.59 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.3 | +0.14 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1561 | 120.5 | -0.88 | -1.25 | 0.909 | 48.2% | +21 | +25 | — | 34.1% | -1.00 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.7 | -0.31 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1551 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1516 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1490 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| Career | — | 1686 | 120.5 | -0.18 | -0.67 | 0.968 | 49.4% | +7 | -58 | +38 | 41.9% | -0.33 | 8–19 (30%) | 5–12 (29%) | 89.4 | +0.43 | — | 1691 | 114.4 | -0.91 | -0.24 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -29 | +20 | +93 | 40.5% | -0.62 | 12–18 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.7 | +1.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Daria Saville | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Kiki Bertens | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 15, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristyna Pliskova | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 1, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Cristina Goncalves | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 28, 2018 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Kristie Ahn | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 22, 2017 | H2H |