H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natasha Zvereva vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1988 Washington quarterfinal 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1988 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natasha Zvereva | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 19 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 20 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 21 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| 25 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| 26 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| 27 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| 28 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |
| 29 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |