H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Natasha Zvereva vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-3

Pam Shriver holds a 3–2 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1992 Filderstadt third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 1992* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Natasha Zvereva #26 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver #34 Match data
Jan 17, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Pam Shriver #41 6-4 7-6(3) Natasha Zvereva #22 Match data
Feb 1, 1991* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #54 6-2 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data
Aug 20, 1988* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Natasha Zvereva #8 7-5 6-3 Pam Shriver #4 Match data
Feb 13, 1988* Dallas WTA 250 QF Hard Pam Shriver #4 7-5 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Natasha Zvereva Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24