H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 0-1
Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 1996 Jakarta third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Nejedly | 7-5 6-3 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |