H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 3-2

Nathalie Dechy holds a 3–2 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2008 Cincinnati fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-6(1).

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2008* Cincinnati WTA 500 R16 Hard Nathalie Dechy #92 7-5 2-6 7-6(1) Katarina Srebotnik #31 Match data
Oct 5, 2006* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Hard Katarina Srebotnik #26 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #39 Match data
Apr 14, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Nathalie Dechy #24 6-2 6-3 Katarina Srebotnik #29 Match data
Jan 8, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Dechy #34 6-4 6-1 Katarina Srebotnik #39 Match data
Oct 24, 2002* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Katarina Srebotnik #40 1-6 6-4 (ret.) Nathalie Dechy #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,845 224 204 52.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 2000 8–18 30.8% #120 1,484 0 1
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,512 0 1
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,727 0 2
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 2004 13–18 41.9% #87 1,596 0 2
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,752 0 4
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,830 0 4
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,740 0 4
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,621 0 4
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1