H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Daniela Marzano H2H: 2-0
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 2–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Fuchs leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1976 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1976* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-4 6-0 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1976* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-3 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,374 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |