Nathalie Fuchs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1973 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 28, 1975 | H2H |
| Sue Mappin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 20, 1975 | H2H |
| Julie Heldman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 17, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Daniela Marzano H2H: 2-0
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 2–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Fuchs leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1976 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | 6-4 6-0 | Daniela Marzano | Match data | Apr 17, 1976* | QF | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-3 | Daniela Marzano | Match data | Apr 9, 1976* | R16 | Nice | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,782 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,375 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 66 | 57 | 123 | 53.7% | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 22 | 52 | 74 | 29.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1489 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1528 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +25 | 38.1% | -1.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | 1968 | 1429 | 90.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -32 | — | 9.1% | -2.73 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1626 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -89 | +40 | -84 | 51.1% | +0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +2.57 | 1969 | 1376 | 89.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | 23.1% | -2.46 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.42 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1683 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -23 | -123 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 10–8 (56%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.5 | +5.03 | 1970 | 1441 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | 42.9% | -0.66 | 4–3 (57%) | — | — | +1.71 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1772 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -3 | -252 | 55.7% | +0.37 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.31 | 1971 | 1483 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | -17 | +43 | 41.0% | -0.85 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.46 |
| 22 | 1975 | 1631 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.9 | -0.41 | 1972 | 1456 | 92.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1629 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 50.0% | +0.37 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.16 | 1973 | 1433 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1635 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.66 | 1974 | 1415 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.23 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1633 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 64.3% | +1.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +2.09 | 1975 | 1416 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.07 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1622 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 1976 | 1462 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -41 | +101 | 46.4% | -0.61 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +1.49 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1591 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.40 | 1977 | 1474 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -52 | +69 | 47.1% | -0.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.97 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1556 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -134 | +42 | 48.3% | -0.66 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.46 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1540 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -142 | — | 30.0% | -1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.3 | -0.42 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1553 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | 60.0% | +0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.50 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +14 | -109 | 49.8% | -0.04 | 25–19 (57%) | 7–10 (41%) | 100.8 | +5.68 | — | 1599 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -47 | +59 | 38.7% | -0.97 | 11–24 (31%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.2 | +5.77 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniela Marzano
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 1, 1978 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 10, 1979 | H2H |
| Corinne Molesworth | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 1, 1977 | H2H |
| Ivanna Madruga | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 8, 1980 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 0 | 2 | 2 | Nov 1, 1979 | H2H |