Nathalie Fuchs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1973 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 28, 1975 | H2H |
| Sue Mappin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 20, 1975 | H2H |
| Julie Heldman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 17, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-1
Florenta Mihai holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1976 Roland Garros round of 16 6-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florenta Mihai | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data | Jun 8, 1976* | R16 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,782 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,799 | 89 | 90 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1973 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1974 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1977 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| 23 | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 66 | 57 | 123 | 53.7% | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 39 | 27 | 66 | 59.1% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 9 | 22 | 31 | 29.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1489 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1528 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +25 | 38.1% | -1.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | 1974 | 1516 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | 63.6% | +1.18 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +1.34 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1626 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -89 | +40 | -84 | 51.1% | +0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +2.57 | 1975 | 1509 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +1.56 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1683 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -23 | -123 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 10–8 (56%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.5 | +5.03 | 1976 | 1634 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +1 | -51 | 41.8% | -0.45 | 7–2 (78%) | 2–3 (40%) | 107.6 | +0.91 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1772 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -3 | -252 | 55.7% | +0.37 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.31 | 1977 | 1774 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -215 | +53 | — | 52.9% | +0.04 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.6 | +0.88 |
| 22 | 1975 | 1631 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.9 | -0.41 | 1978 | 1643 | 119.2 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +89 | -110 | 25.9% | -1.90 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.0 | -1.87 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1629 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 50.0% | +0.37 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.16 | 1979 | 1615 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | -69 | — | -31 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.94 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1635 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.66 | 1980 | 1579 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +168 | -47 | 47.5% | -0.47 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.7 | +1.23 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1633 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 64.3% | +1.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +2.09 | 1981 | 1652 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +130 | — | 67.7% | +1.51 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.8 | +2.54 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1622 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 1982 | 1618 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +106 | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.59 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1591 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.40 | 1983 | 1625 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.80 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +14 | -109 | 49.8% | -0.04 | 25–19 (57%) | 7–10 (41%) | 100.8 | +5.68 | — | 1800 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | -97 | +66 | -73 | 49.3% | -0.08 | 28–24 (54%) | 12–17 (41%) | 101.3 | +4.59 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Florenta Mihai
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 12, 1981 | H2H |
| Mima Jausovec | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 18, 1979 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 3, 1983 | H2H |
| Betty Stove | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 13, 1980 | H2H |
| Katja Ebbinghaus | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 30, 1980 | H2H |