H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Helga Masthoff H2H: 0-1
Helga Masthoff holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helga Masthoff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helga Masthoff won the 1976 Monte Carlo semifinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRG
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1976* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 7-5 6-3 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Helga Masthoff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 |