H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 0-2
Ingrid Bentzer holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ingrid Bentzer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ingrid Bentzer won the 1975 Rome third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 6-4 6-2 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1972* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |