H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Laura Dupont H2H: 2-3
Laura Dupont holds a 3–2 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1977 Roland Garros second round 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1975* | Jacksonville | WTA 250 | QF | — | Laura Dupont | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1973* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 1-6 7-6 7-6 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| May 27, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1971* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Laura Dupont | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |