H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Laurie Tenney H2H: 2-1
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 2–1 lead over Laurie Tenney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nathalie Fuchs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1975 Fort Myers third round 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1975* | Fort Myers | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1973* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Laurie Tenney | 6-2 6-7 6-4 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1972* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-4 6-1 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Laurie Tenney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |