H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Linda Tuero H2H: 1-2
Linda Tuero holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Fuchs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1973 Indianapolis fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1973* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Linda Tuero | 6-2 6-1 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1973* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Linda Tuero | 6-2 7-5 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nathalie Fuchs | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |