Nathalie Fuchs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1973 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 28, 1975 | H2H |
| Sue Mappin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 20, 1975 | H2H |
| Julie Heldman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 17, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 1-0
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 1–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Fuchs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1974 Italian Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data | May 27, 1974* | R64 | Italian Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,782 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 119 | 131 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 24–22 | 52.2% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1974 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1971 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1973 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 27 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 66 | 57 | 123 | 53.7% | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 63 | 49 | 112 | 56.2% | 35 | 43 | 78 | 44.9% | 13 | 24 | 37 | 35.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1489 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1528 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +25 | 38.1% | -1.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | 1968 | 1474 | 92.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.67 | — | — | — | -0.49 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1626 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -89 | +40 | -84 | 51.1% | +0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +2.57 | 1969 | 1493 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -25 | +32 | 43.3% | -0.40 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.38 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1683 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -23 | -123 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 10–8 (56%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.5 | +5.03 | 1970 | 1546 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -67 | +32 | 44.1% | -0.27 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | +2.08 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1772 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -3 | -252 | 55.7% | +0.37 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.31 | 1971 | 1592 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -43 | +23 | 54.3% | +0.19 | 6–6 (50%) | — | — | +5.42 |
| 22 | 1975 | 1631 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.9 | -0.41 | 1972 | 1569 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | -31 | — | +57 | 38.9% | -0.50 | 0–4 (0%) | — | — | +0.37 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1629 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 50.0% | +0.37 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.16 | 1973 | 1622 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -107 | +162 | -45 | 57.1% | +0.63 | 8–8 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.5 | +5.47 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1635 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.66 | 1974 | 1548 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +112 | -42 | 44.7% | -0.34 | 5–8 (38%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.5 | +2.55 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1633 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 64.3% | +1.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +2.09 | 1975 | 1594 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +63 | +45 | 53.3% | +0.47 | 5–8 (38%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.5 | +2.76 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1622 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 1976 | 1568 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +19 | — | 43.6% | -0.39 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–1 | — | +3.44 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1591 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.40 | 1977 | 1574 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +89 | — | 40.6% | -0.56 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +1.94 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +14 | -109 | 49.8% | -0.04 | 25–19 (57%) | 7–10 (41%) | 100.8 | +5.68 | — | 1739 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +70 | +10 | 48.6% | 0.00 | 33–47 (41%) | 9–8 (53%) | 94.2 | +9.30 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lindsey Beaven
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corinne Molesworth | 5 | 5 | 10 | Oct 9, 1976 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 19, 1974 | H2H |
| Penny Moor | 4 | 0 | 4 | Oct 28, 1976 | H2H |
| Lindsay Blachford | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jun 6, 1975 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 24, 1975 | H2H |