H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 1-0
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 1–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Fuchs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1974 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1974* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 |