H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira H2H: 1-2
Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira won the 1978 Barcelona fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1978* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | 6-2 6-4 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1978* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-4 | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1978* | Barcelona Real | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | 6-4 6-4 | Nathalie Fuchs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,786 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | — | — | — | 1,565 | 27 | 37 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |