Nathalie Fuchs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 29, 1973 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 28, 1975 | H2H |
| Sue Mappin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 20, 1975 | H2H |
| Julie Heldman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 17, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Fuchs vs Odile De Roubin H2H: 2-0
Nathalie Fuchs holds a 2–0 lead over Odile De Roubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Fuchs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Fuchs won the 1973 Alexandria final 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | 6-2 6-0 | Odile De Roubin | Match data | Mar 18, 1973* | F | Alexandria | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Nathalie Fuchs | 6-4 6-2 | Odile De Roubin | Match data | Oct 7, 1972* | SF | Aix-En-Provence | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Fuchs | — | — | — | 1,782 | 104 | 103 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Odile De Roubin | — | — | — | 1,706 | 94 | 89 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Odile De Roubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 12–9 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 24–12 | 66.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1975 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1976 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1978 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 8 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Odile De Roubin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1973 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1974 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1973 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 66 | 57 | 123 | 53.7% | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 80 | 64 | 144 | 55.6% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nathalie Fuchs | Odile De Roubin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1489 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1528 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | +25 | 38.1% | -1.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 1626 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -89 | +40 | -84 | 51.1% | +0.14 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +2.57 | 1968 | 1558 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | 54.1% | +0.14 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | 0.00 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1683 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -23 | -123 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 10–8 (56%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.5 | +5.03 | 1969 | 1594 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | 54.2% | +0.23 | 4–2 (67%) | — | — | +2.02 |
| 21 | 1974 | 1772 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -3 | -252 | 55.7% | +0.37 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.31 | 1970 | 1693 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | -109 | +52 | — | 61.7% | +1.07 | 7–4 (64%) | — | — | +4.49 |
| 22 | 1975 | 1631 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.9 | -0.41 | 1971 | 1641 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +56 | — | 48.8% | +0.29 | 3–4 (43%) | — | — | +3.66 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1629 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 50.0% | +0.37 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.16 | 1972 | 1566 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -19 | +107 | -89 | 44.8% | -0.28 | 5–4 (56%) | — | — | +2.97 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1635 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.66 | 1973 | 1608 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +111 | -133 | 53.2% | +0.18 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +3.26 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1633 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 64.3% | +1.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +2.09 | 1974 | 1559 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 43.9% | -0.27 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | +1.74 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1622 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | 1975 | 1523 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | 40.0% | -0.50 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +1.94 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1591 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.40 | 1976 | 1479 | 93.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | 14.3% | -2.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.66 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 127.4 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +14 | -109 | 49.8% | -0.04 | 25–19 (57%) | 7–10 (41%) | 100.8 | +5.68 | — | 1707 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +65 | -114 | 50.7% | +0.15 | 28–28 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.4 | +11.40 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Odile De Roubin
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 13, 1975 | H2H |
| Daniele Bouteleux | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 17, 1973 | H2H |
| Fiorella Bonicelli | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 21, 1973 | H2H |
| Jacqueline Rees Lewis | 4 | 0 | 4 | Oct 7, 1972 | H2H |
| Lea Pericoli | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 13, 1974 | H2H |