H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 1-1

Nathalie Herreman and Ivanna Madruga are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1986 Perugia quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ivanna Madruga
ARG Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #87 6-3 6-4 Ivanna Madruga Match data Jul 12, 1986* QF Perugia WTA 250 Clay
Ivanna Madruga 6-0 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #70 Match data May 23, 1984* R64 Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ivanna Madruga — — — 1,916 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ivanna Madruga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1978 6–6 50.0% — 1,555 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1979 7–10 41.2% — 1,628 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1980 29–18 61.7% — 1,799 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1981 17–14 54.8% — 1,752 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1982 27–13 67.5% — 1,822 0 1
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1983 25–12 67.6% — 1,881 0 1
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1984 14–8 63.6% — 1,830 0 1
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1986 5–5 50.0% — 1,775 0 1
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ivanna Madruga
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ivanna Madruga
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1505 101.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.30
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1977 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1978 1556 122.4 — — — — — +14 — 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.29
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1979 1628 139.2 — — — — +21 -20 -52 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.36
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1980 1799 145.3 — — — — -111 +67 — 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.59
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1981 1752 140.7 — — — — -101 +165 -157 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -2.27
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1982 1822 151.7 — — — — -199 +149 — 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 — -2.76
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1983 1882 143.6 — — — — -151 +78 — 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.61
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1984 1830 128.9 — — — — — +30 — 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1986 1776 112.3 — — — — — +16 — 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1917 148.0 — — — — -116 +85 -109 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.