H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Herreman vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 1-1
Nathalie Herreman and Ivanna Madruga are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1986 Perugia quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1986* | Perugia | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Nathalie Herreman | 6-3 6-4 | Ivanna Madruga | Match data |
| May 23, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-0 6-3 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Herreman | Ivanna Madruga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |