H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 1-9
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 9–1 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 6–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2001 WTA Tour Championships fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
9
10 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Tauziat | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |