H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-2

Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Brighton round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-3.

FRA Age 59 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova #16 4-6 6-2 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #20 Match data Oct 26, 1989* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-1 3-6 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #26 Match data Oct 31, 1987* SF Zurich Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat — #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,850 0 0 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,876 0 0 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,935 0 1 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Hana Mandlikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Hana Mandlikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +23 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89
18 1986 1644 133.2 — — — — -36 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.56 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35
19 1987 1822 144.0 — — — — -38 -86 -164 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -0.47 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +38 -106 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -0.80 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -63 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.71 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62
22 1990 1962 157.2 — — — — +21 -108 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -50 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37
24 1992 1935 154.1 — — — — +33 -15 +3 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69
25 1993 1976 158.4 — — — — +43 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30
27 1995 1846 146.3 — — — — -44 +6 +203 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66
28 1996 1800 152.1 — — — — -33 +40 +315 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31
29 1997 1978 157.1 — — — — -45 -150 +208 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 2025 161.2 — — — — +1 -296 +204 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +44 -148 +296 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -189 +393 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.5 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.24 — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.