H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Pam Shriver H2H: 5-2

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 5–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1995 US Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #20 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #131 Match data
Jun 11, 1994* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Nathalie Tauziat #22 6-1 6-3 Pam Shriver #52 Match data
Oct 14, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #17 6-4 6-4 Pam Shriver #32 Match data
Jun 19, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #14 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver #31 Match data
Oct 17, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #15 5-7 6-3 6-1 Pam Shriver #32 Match data
Aug 19, 1988* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Pam Shriver #4 7-6 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #34 Match data
Jun 13, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver #6 6-0 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24