H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nerida Gregory vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1
Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Nerida Gregory in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1981 Tokyo Borden fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1981* | Tokyo Borden | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patricia Medrado | 6-1 6-4 | Nerida Gregory | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nerida Gregory | — | — | — | 1,647 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nerida Gregory | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1977 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1981 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |