H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nerida Gregory vs Susan Leo H2H: 2-0
Nerida Gregory holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nerida Gregory leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Nerida Gregory won the 1980 Adelaide second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 64
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1980* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Nerida Gregory | 6-4 7-6 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1977* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Nerida Gregory | 6-2 6-0 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nerida Gregory | — | — | — | 1,647 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nerida Gregory | Susan Leo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1975 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1977 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1978 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |