H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Nicole Gibbs vs Carol Zhao H2H: 1-0
Nicole Gibbs holds a 1–0 lead over Carol Zhao in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Gibbs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Gibbs won the 2016 Stanford third round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 31
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2016* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Gibbs | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Carol Zhao | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,692 | 37 | 60 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carol Zhao | #432 | #131 | 458 | 1,515 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Gibbs | Carol Zhao | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #293 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #176 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #219 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |