H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 1-0
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2006 Amelia Island third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2006* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Vaidisova | Laura Pous-Tio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |