H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Barbara Jordan H2H: 0-1

Barbara Jordan holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Jordan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Jordan won the 1980 Las Vegas Futures round of 32 6-4 6-2.

SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Jordan 6-4 6-2 Nina Bohm Match data Jan 17, 1980* R32 Las Vegas Futures WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm — — — 1,708 55 64 46.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Barbara Jordan — — — 1,704 65 102 38.9% 1 0 0 0 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Barbara Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1 1974 4–1 80.0% — 1,551 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,583 0 0
19 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,573 0 0
20 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,649 0 1 1977 3–2 60.0% — 1,619 0 0
21 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2 1978 0–6 0.0% — 1,531 0 0
22 1980 9–15 37.5% — 1,677 0 2 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,658 1 1
23 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,664 0 2 1980 17–19 47.2% — 1,677 1 1
24 — — — — — — — 1981 11–16 40.7% — 1,636 1 1
25 — — — — — — — 1982 8–16 33.3% — 1,615 1 1
26 — — — — — — — 1983 4–12 25.0% — 1,535 1 1
27 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,522 1 1
28 — — — — — — — 1985 2–6 25.0% — 1,489 1 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Barbara Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
18 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 20 32 37.5% — 15 29 44 34.1% 20 29 49 40.8% 22 20 42 52.4% 6 22 28 21.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Barbara Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31 1974 1552 111.5 — — — — — — +71 72.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.97
18 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.06 1975 1583 110.0 — — — — — — +70 75.0% +1.88 — — — +0.71
19 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +9 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.78 1976 1573 101.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — +0.47
20 1978 1649 133.4 — — — — +43 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.40 1977 1619 117.5 — — — — — — — 63.6% +0.36 0–1 — — -0.49
21 1979 1665 113.1 — — — — +6 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.31 1978 1532 102.7 — — — — +2 — — 16.7% -2.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.90
22 1980 1678 126.4 — — — — -117 -77 -27 39.3% -0.87 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.6 -1.45 1979 1659 139.7 — — — — -114 -133 +100 40.8% -0.63 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 -0.05
23 1981 1665 120.9 — — — — -87 +18 +14 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.6 +0.83 1980 1678 120.4 — — — — -142 -55 +52 46.5% -0.51 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 +0.73
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1636 113.3 — — — — -29 -11 — 42.1% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +2.12
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1616 116.0 — — — — -83 -27 +105 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 -0.98
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1535 105.4 — — — — -45 — +159 30.6% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.14
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1523 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1489 92.3 — — — — -27 — — 23.5% -1.94 1–0 — — +1.20
Career — 1708 126.2 — — — — -54 -29 -7 46.1% -0.30 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.5 +1.84 — 1705 123.3 — — — — -79 -46 +102 41.0% -0.73 12–17 (41%) 14–16 (47%) 99.7 +4.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.