Nina Bohm
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 28, 1981 | H2H |
| Iva Budarova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 30, 1980 | H2H |
| Mima Jausovec | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 6, 1980 | H2H |
| Stacy Margolin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 26, 1981 | H2H |
| Marcela Skuherska | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 20, 1981 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Bohm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1981 Chicago round of 32 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-3 | Nina Bohm | Match data | Jan 29, 1981* | R32 | Chicago | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Bohm | — | — | — | 1,714 | 55 | 63 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,315 | 518 | 191 | 73.1% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 37–14 | 72.5% | — | 1,990 | 0 | 7 |
| 18 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #4 | 2,235 | 1 | 13 |
| 19 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | #5 | 2,127 | 2 | 16 |
| 20 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #7 | 2,025 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 1979 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,982 | 2 | 16 |
| 22 | 1980 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,084 | 2 | 21 |
| 23 | 1981 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,213 | 3 | 24 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,242 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,156 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,045 | 4 | 27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,945 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,810 | 4 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 23 | 4 | 27 | 85.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 18 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1980 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 82.6% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% |
| 19 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% |
| 20 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1982 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1983 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 22 | 1980 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 27 | 2 | 29 | 93.1% |
| 23 | 1981 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1985 | 22 | 5 | 27 | 81.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 12 | 19 | 31 | 38.7% | — | 143 | 54 | 197 | 72.6% | 119 | 46 | 165 | 72.1% | 116 | 36 | 152 | 76.3% | 133 | 52 | 185 | 71.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nina Bohm | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1492 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 16 | 1974 | 1492 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 | 1978 | 1759 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -128 | -39 | 71.4% | +1.84 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.0 | +1.62 |
| 17 | 1975 | 1497 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +1.25 | — | — | — | +0.31 | 1979 | 1991 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | -306 | -198 | +6 | 67.9% | +1.46 | 9–3 (75%) | 5–6 (45%) | 108.6 | -0.72 |
| 18 | 1976 | 1531 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.70 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.06 | 1980 | 2235 | 168.8 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -219 | -70 | 77.5% | +2.09 | 15–12 (56%) | 9–6 (60%) | 107.8 | -9.15 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1519 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +8 | 50.0% | -0.29 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.77 | 1981 | 2127 | 168.7 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -13 | +80 | 70.8% | +1.60 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–6 (45%) | 100.4 | -6.49 |
| 20 | 1978 | 1649 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | -15 | 53.1% | +0.29 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.7 | +0.41 | 1982 | 2025 | 155.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +111 | +37 | 60.3% | +0.61 | 12–5 (71%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | -6.83 |
| 21 | 1979 | 1664 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -148 | — | 48.0% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.4 | +1.29 | 1983 | 1983 | 163.6 | — | — | — | — | +67 | +169 | +26 | 70.3% | +1.45 | 3–9 (25%) | 7–1 (88%) | 95.7 | -3.35 |
| 22 | 1980 | 1684 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | -108 | -84 | -33 | 40.7% | -0.80 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–3 (25%) | 103.4 | -1.64 | 1984 | 2084 | 165.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +34 | -16 | 76.7% | +2.05 | 10–5 (67%) | 8–4 (67%) | 103.0 | -1.62 |
| 23 | 1981 | 1666 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +16 | +13 | 46.2% | -0.24 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–6 (33%) | 100.5 | +0.79 | 1985 | 2213 | 169.9 | — | — | — | — | +68 | -92 | -93 | 76.0% | +1.84 | 9–5 (64%) | 12–3 (80%) | 109.1 | -4.75 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2242 | 174.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -48 | -79 | 70.7% | +1.50 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.7 | -6.78 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2156 | 168.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +20 | +142 | 75.8% | +1.97 | 9–3 (75%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.5 | -3.19 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2045 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +89 | +61 | +204 | 65.3% | +1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.6 | -0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1946 | 155.1 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +103 | +225 | 57.5% | +0.38 | 15–3 (83%) | 9–3 (75%) | 105.5 | -3.52 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1810 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +120 | +176 | +361 | 51.4% | +0.19 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.31 |
| Career | — | 1714 | 126.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | -32 | -8 | 46.4% | -0.28 | 28–24 (54%) | 12–17 (41%) | 104.3 | +1.64 | — | 2316 | 169.2 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -14 | +17 | 70.3% | +1.52 | 108–63 (63%) | 76–52 (59%) | 107.2 | -6.38 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 28, 1981 | H2H |
| Iva Budarova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 30, 1980 | H2H |
| Mima Jausovec | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 6, 1980 | H2H |
| Stacy Margolin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 26, 1981 | H2H |
| Marcela Skuherska | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 20, 1981 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 8 | 27 | 35 | Aug 12, 1989 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 8 | 19 | 27 | Mar 6, 1989 | H2H |
| Sylvia Hanika | 11 | 7 | 18 | Mar 28, 1987 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 15 | 1 | 16 | Feb 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 12 | 2 | 14 | Oct 21, 1989 | H2H |