H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nina Bohm vs Tanya Harford H2H: 1-0

Nina Bohm holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nina Bohm leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nina Bohm won the 1978 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 7-6 4-6 6-2.

SWE Age 68 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nina Bohm 7-6 4-6 6-2 Tanya Harford Match data Oct 27, 1978* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nina Bohm 1,714 55 63 46.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Tanya Harford 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nina Bohm Tanya Harford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
16 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,479 0 0
17 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 1 1976 4–5 44.4% 1,512 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% 1,530 0 1 1977 7–13 35.0% 1,559 0 0
19 1977 2–3 40.0% 1,518 0 1 1978 3–6 33.3% 1,558 0 0
20 1978 11–10 52.4% 1,648 0 1 1979 13–10 56.5% 1,716 0 0
21 1979 11–11 50.0% 1,664 0 2 1980 12–20 37.5% 1,673 0 0
22 1980 9–14 39.1% 1,684 0 2 1981 8–10 44.4% 1,630 0 0
23 1981 19–20 48.7% 1,665 0 2 1982 3–5 37.5% 1,629 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nina Bohm Tanya Harford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 4 4 8 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 1 7 8 12.5% 16 16 32 50.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nina Bohm Tanya Harford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.14
16 1974 1492 103.0 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.05 1975 1479 94.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.26
17 1975 1497 103.5 50.0% +1.25 +0.31 1976 1512 106.0 +67 +25 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 +0.59
18 1976 1531 112.9 40.0% -0.70 1–2 (33%) +0.06 1977 1559 123.8 +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04
19 1977 1519 98.6 +8 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.77 1978 1559 111.9 +34 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 +0.55
20 1978 1649 133.2 +45 -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.41 1979 1716 133.6 -51 -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24
21 1979 1664 113.1 +7 -148 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.29 1980 1674 130.7 -52 -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35
22 1980 1684 128.0 -108 -84 -33 40.7% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.4 -1.64 1981 1631 111.6 +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28
23 1981 1666 120.7 -79 +16 +13 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.5 +0.79 1982 1629 118.4 -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.05
Career 1714 126.5 -47 -32 -8 46.4% -0.28 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.3 +1.64 1785 128.9 -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.