H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nuria Llagostera Vives vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-2
Iveta Benesova holds a 2–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iveta Benesova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2010 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Iveta Benesova | 6-3 7-6(6) | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iveta Benesova | 6-0 6-2 | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |