H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nuria Llagostera Vives vs Zi Yan H2H: 0-1
Zi Yan holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zi Yan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zi Yan won the 2005 Guangzhou final 6-4 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2005* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Zi Yan | 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Nuria Llagostera Vives | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |