H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Olga Govortsova vs Alexandra Panova H2H: 0-1
Alexandra Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Olga Govortsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandra Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexandra Panova won the 2009 Guangzhou fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexandra Panova | 7-5 6-4 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexandra Panova | #1,014 | #71 | 890 | 1,546 | 32 | 52 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Govortsova | Alexandra Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #208 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #153 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #88 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #135 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #133 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |