H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Olga Govortsova vs Anastasiya Yakimova H2H: 0-1
Anastasiya Yakimova holds a 1–0 lead over Olga Govortsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasiya Yakimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasiya Yakimova won the 2009 Miami first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anastasiya Yakimova | 6-2 6-1 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anastasiya Yakimova | #1,233 | #49 | 989 | 1,526 | 30 | 74 | 28.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Govortsova | Anastasiya Yakimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #103 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #120 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #256 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |