H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olga Govortsova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-1
Olga Govortsova and Jill Craybas are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2008 Guangzhou fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2008* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 6-2 7-5 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Govortsova | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |