H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olga Govortsova vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-1
Olga Govortsova and Michaella Krajicek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2013 Tashkent third round 7-5 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 7-5 2-6 6-1 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2012* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Govortsova | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |