H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Olga Govortsova vs Sania Mirza H2H: 1-2
Sania Mirza holds a 2–1 lead over Olga Govortsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2009 US Open first round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2008* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 4-6 7-6(5) 3-2 (ret.) | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-1 6-1 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Govortsova | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |