H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Olga Savchuk vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-0
Olga Savchuk holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Savchuk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Savchuk won the 2009 Guangzhou third round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Olga Savchuk | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Savchuk | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |