H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Olga Savchuk vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 0-1
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 1–0 lead over Olga Savchuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2004 Tashkent quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2004* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-2 6-3 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Savchuk | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |