H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olga Savchuk vs Sania Mirza H2H: 0-2
Sania Mirza holds a 2–0 lead over Olga Savchuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2008 Indian Wells second round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-3 7-5 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Savchuk | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |