H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ons Jabeur vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-2

Shuai Peng holds a 2–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2017 Guangzhou Open first round 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ons Jabeur
Tunisia Age 32 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #24 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 Ons Jabeur #91 Match data Sep 20, 2017* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #44 6-4 2-6 6-1 Ons Jabeur #140 Match data Apr 24, 2014* R32 Marrakech International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ons Jabeur #439 #2 5,210 2,106 221 154 58.9% 0 1 0 2 2 5
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ons Jabeur Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2012 0–2 0.0% #260 1,486 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2013 3–3 50.0% #137 1,505 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2014 2–7 22.2% #143 1,467 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #220 1,455 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2016 0–3 0.0% #196 1,440 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2017 9–11 45.0% #88 1,588 0 0 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2018 9–12 42.9% #60 1,734 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2019 15–19 44.1% #76 1,711 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2020 21–11 65.6% #31 1,862 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2021 48–19 71.6% #10 1,969 0 1 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2022 47–17 73.4% #2 2,006 0 3 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2023 36–18 66.7% #6 1,970 0 5 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2024 16–15 51.6% #42 1,883 0 5 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2025 14–12 53.8% #75 1,829 0 5 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ons Jabeur Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2015 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 6 9 15 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2019 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2021 25 13 38 65.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2022 19 12 31 61.3% 17 4 21 81.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2023 18 12 30 60.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2025 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 105 225 53.3% 59 30 89 66.3% 42 19 61 68.9% — — — — — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 347/376 of Ons Jabeur's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ons Jabeur Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2012 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.6% 68.0% 45.0% 55.6% 42.9% 57.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 6/6 1.5 3.0 53.1% 64.9% 50.1% 36.5% 62.1% 58.1% 50.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 8/9 1.5 4.1 53.6% 62.3% 45.0% 43.1% 39.9% 54.2% 44.9% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2015 4/6 2.0 2.8 45.6% 64.9% 40.9% 41.5% 43.8% 52.3% 37.0% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2016 2/3 4.0 2.0 59.0% 48.3% 43.0% 47.4% 69.2% 46.0% 27.5% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2017 20/20 3.8 3.1 50.0% 65.2% 48.3% 62.4% 37.6% 56.8% 42.1% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2018 20/21 3.5 3.0 51.6% 64.6% 46.6% 55.6% 54.0% 55.9% 43.1% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2019 33/34 4.3 3.0 54.7% 64.4% 44.6% 51.6% 51.8% 55.4% 41.5% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2020 32/32 3.9 3.3 52.1% 68.5% 50.5% 51.1% 48.5% 59.8% 44.5% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2021 65/67 4.2 2.5 54.3% 71.6% 49.6% 62.7% 48.4% 61.6% 46.7% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2022 64/64 3.5 2.2 56.5% 69.2% 49.0% 53.2% 53.1% 60.4% 46.2% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2023 53/54 3.4 3.0 54.7% 67.7% 45.9% 52.3% 51.3% 57.5% 46.7% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2024 30/31 4.0 1.9 57.4% 70.7% 49.6% 53.5% 42.6% 61.4% 41.7% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2025 9/27 2.6 2.7 56.2% 62.9% 46.0% 49.1% 38.8% 55.2% 37.8% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 347/376 3.7 2.7 54.4% 68.0% 47.9% 54.4% 49.1% 58.8% 44.5% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ons Jabeur Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 2012 1487 105.5 -1.07 -1.48 0.888 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — 0.00 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2013 1505 112.0 +0.34 +1.50 1.206 54.1% +22 — — 66.7% +1.25 0–2 — — +0.49 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2014 1467 107.4 -1.06 +0.45 0.980 49.3% +20 +73 — 36.4% -0.77 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.09 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2015 1456 113.6 -0.27 -2.59 0.775 44.6% +16 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.32 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2016 1441 102.1 -0.75 -4.05 0.508 38.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.03 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2017 1588 123.8 +0.47 -0.03 0.973 49.5% -27 -27 — 47.8% -0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.03 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2018 1734 134.6 +0.39 -0.19 0.977 49.4% -26 -155 — 45.7% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.98 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2019 1711 130.6 -1.19 -0.06 0.930 48.5% -31 — +9 47.9% -0.34 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) 106.2 -0.87 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2020 1862 150.9 +2.75 +2.22 1.107 51.8% 0 -258 — 61.0% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 6–6 (50%) 105.8 -0.70 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2021 1970 155.8 +4.76 +3.62 1.217 53.9% -17 -155 -24 65.8% +1.26 15–6 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 108.6 +0.57 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2022 2006 157.3 +3.78 +4.23 1.167 53.3% -60 +33 +127 68.9% +1.17 16–8 (67%) 10–6 (63%) 105.1 -2.17 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2023 1971 148.1 +1.74 +3.95 1.099 51.9% -48 +96 +166 62.1% +0.73 12–4 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 104.3 -0.38 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2024 1883 132.4 +3.87 -0.52 1.080 51.2% -76 +115 +257 55.1% +0.30 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 93.8 +0.39 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2025 1829 141.3 -0.24 -2.63 0.843 46.3% +43 +64 +247 55.4% +0.27 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 97.0 +0.01 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 2106 149.2 +2.34 +2.11 1.080 51.5% -22 -9 +112 58.1% +0.55 68–56 (55%) 52–49 (51%) 102.1 -1.02 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.