H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Vera Zvonareva H2H: 3-1
Ons Jabeur holds a 3–1 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2023 Ningbo quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2023* | Ningbo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2022* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2018* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 6-2 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-2 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |