H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Casale vs Cecilia Fernandez Parker H2H: 1-0

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Cecilia Fernandez Parker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1986 Boca Raton round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cecilia Fernandez Parker
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #48 6-4 6-2 Cecilia Fernandez Parker Match data Feb 11, 1986* R128 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cecilia Fernandez Parker — — — 1,573 17 24 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pam Casale Cecilia Fernandez Parker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0 1978 2–1 66.7% — 1,517 0 0
1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0 1982 3–3 50.0% — 1,512 0 1
1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,522 0 2
1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 2
1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0 1985 8–7 53.3% — 1,550 0 2
1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0 1986 2–8 20.0% — 1,493 0 2
1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% — 1,483 0 2
1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Pam Casale Cecilia Fernandez Parker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7% Career 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Pam Casale Cecilia Fernandez Parker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02 1978 1517 102.7 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–0 — +0.19
1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97 1982 1512 100.5 — — — — +99 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–2 — +1.05
1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37 1983 1522 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.27
1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57 1984 1510 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46 1985 1550 115.4 — — — — +51 — — 53.1% +0.34 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.87
1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08 1986 1493 95.8 — — — — +37 +41 — 25.0% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.91
1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63 1987 1483 99.4 — — — — — +20 — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 — — -0.01
1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42 Career 1574 105.2 — — — — +57 +29 — 39.5% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 +8.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.