H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Casale vs Kate Gompert H2H: 2-1
Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Kate Gompert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Chicago third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1987* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kate Gompert | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1986* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pam Casale | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Pam Casale | 6-4 6-0 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Casale | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |