H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pam Casale vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 0-3
Leigh Anne Thompson holds a 3–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leigh Anne Thompson leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leigh Anne Thompson won the 1983 Mahwah second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Leigh Anne Thompson | 6-2 6-0 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1982* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Leigh Anne Thompson | 6-3 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1982* | Orange | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Leigh Anne Thompson | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leigh Anne Thompson | — | — | — | 1,793 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Casale | Leigh Anne Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–8 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |