H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Pam Casale vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 0-4
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 4–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1989 Houston third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-0 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1987* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 0-6 6-3 7-6 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1986* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-2 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pam Casale | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |