H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 6-2

Pam Shriver holds a 6–2 lead over Andrea Jaeger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1983 US Open quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 7-6 6-3 Andrea Jaeger Match data Sep 9, 1983* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Pam Shriver 6-2 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jul 28, 1983 RR Sydney Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 3-6 7-6 7-6 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 9, 1982* SF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Dec 19, 1981* QF East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-1 7-6 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 22, 1981* F Perth 2 WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Jaeger 7-6 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 18, 1980* QF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 0-6 6-4 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Aug 15, 1980* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-0 Andrea Jaeger Match data Mar 6, 1980* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 — — — — — — —
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 — — — — — — —
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 — — — — — — —
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7%
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.